-
Meho, L.I.; Yang, K.: Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty : Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? : a macrolevel study (2008)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 3375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 3375, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3375)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Archambault, E.; Campbell, D; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 3933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 3933, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3933)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Meho, L.I.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies : a tale of two citation databases - Scopus and Web of Science (2009)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 285, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=285)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F.de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data : a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI (2010)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Opthof, T.: Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations (2010)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
- Object
- Scopus
-
García, J.A.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R.; Fdez-Valdivia, J.: Ranking of the subject areas of Scopus (2011)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 920, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=920)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Calculating the h-index : Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar? (2011)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 3495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 3495, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3495)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F. de; Nooy, W. de: Aggregated journal-journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays (2016)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 4090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 4090, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4090)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Gantman, E.R.; Dabós, M.P.: Research output and impact of the fields of management, economics, and sociology in Spain and France : an analysis using Google Scholar and Scopus (2018)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Abdelkareem, M.A.A.: In terms of publication index, what indicator is the best for researchers indexing, Google Scholar, Scopus, Clarivate or others? (2018)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Casarin, H.C.S.; Mattos, N.B. de: Child's information behavior in the domain of information science : an analysis through the Scopus database (2016)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 944, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=944)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Chen, L.; Fang, H.: ¬An automatic method for ex-tracting innovative ideas based on the Scopus® database (2019)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Chawla, D.S.: Hundreds of 'predatory' journals indexed on leading scholarly database (2021)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
- Object
- Scopus
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Do new research issues attract more citations? : a comparison between 25 Scopus subject categories (2021)
8.12
8.117949 = weight(object_ss:Scopus in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
8.117949 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
8.117949 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
- Object
- Scopus
