Search (604 results, page 18 of 31)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Smolinsky, L.; Lercher, A.; McDaniel, A.: Testing theories of preferential attachment in random networks of citations (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  2. Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.: Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers : an analysis of the data from highlycited.com (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  3. Rotolo, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  4. Pratt, T.C.: ¬A bibliometric for the publication of inconsequential work (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  5. Kozak, M.; Iefremova, O.; Szkola, J.; Sas, D.: Do researchers provide public or institutional E-mail accounts as correspondence E-mails in scientific articles? (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  6. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.: ¬The VQR, Italy's second national research assessment : methodological failures and ranking distortions (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3256, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3256)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  7. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: Growth rates of modern science : a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  8. Schreiber, M.: ¬A variant of the h-index to measure recent performance (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  9. Crispo, E.: ¬A new index to use in conjunction with the h-index to account for an author's relative contribution to publications with high impact (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  10. Malesios, C.: Some variations on the standard theoretical models for the h-index : a comparative analysis (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  11. Yan, E.: Research dynamics, impact, and dissemination : a topic-level analysis (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3272, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3272)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  12. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  13. Bornmann, L.: Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  14. Bornmann, L.: How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? : The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  15. Chang, K.-C.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, C,-C.: Threshold effects of the patent H-index in the relationship between patent citations and market value (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3344, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3344)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  16. Kim, J.; Diesner, J.: Coauthorship networks : a directed network approach considering the order and number of coauthors (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3346, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3346)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  17. Vrettas, G.; Sanderson, M.: Conferences versus journals in computer science (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3347, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3347)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  18. Bornmann, L.; Bauer, J.; Haunschild, R.: Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  19. Bartolucci, F.: ¬A comparison between the g-index and the h-index based on concentration (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  20. Bornmann, L.: Nature's top 100 revisited (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3351, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3351)
    Theme
    Informetrie

Authors

Languages

  • e 565
  • d 37
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 589
  • el 18
  • m 8
  • s 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications