-
Schreiber, M.: ¬An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index (2008)
9.76
9.755557 = weight(object_ss:h-Index in 2968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
9.755557 = fieldWeight in 2968, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.755557 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2968)
- Object
- h-Index
-
Schreiber, M.: ¬A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors (2009)
9.76
9.755557 = weight(object_ss:h-Index in 3858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
9.755557 = fieldWeight in 3858, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.755557 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3858)
- Object
- h-Index
-
Gianoli, E.; Molina-Montenegro, M.A.: Insights into the relationship between the h-index and self-citations (2009)
9.76
9.755557 = weight(object_ss:h-Index in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
9.755557 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.755557 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
- Object
- h-Index
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009)
9.76
9.755557 = weight(object_ss:h-Index in 3861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
9.755557 = fieldWeight in 3861, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.755557 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3861)
- Object
- h-Index
-
Bletsas, A.; Sahalos, J.N.: Hirsch index rankings require scaling and higher moment (2009)
9.76
9.755557 = weight(object_ss:h-Index in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
9.755557 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.755557 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
- Object
- h-Index