Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.-D.: Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? : a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008) 9.30 
    9.298992 = weight(author_ss:Mutz, R. in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  9.298992 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
    Author
    Mutz, R.
  2. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009) 9.30 
    9.298992 = weight(author_ss:Mutz, R. in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  9.298992 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    9.298992 = idf(docFreq=10, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
    Author
    Mutz, R.

Authors