Search (72 results, page 3 of 4)

  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  1. Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Haustein, S.; Larivière, V.: Who reads research articles? : an altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories (2015) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  2. Mohammadi , E.; Thelwall, M.: Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities : research evaluation and knowledge flows (2014) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  3. Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3495, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3495)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  4. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  5. Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3856, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3856)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  6. Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  7. Thelwall, M.; Wilson, P.: Does research with statistics have more impact? : the citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3900, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3900)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  8. Sud, P.; Thelwall, M.: Not all international collaboration is beneficial : the Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  9. Thelwall, M.: Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles : an analysis of 45 fields (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  10. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4211, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4211)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  11. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Patent citation analysis with Google (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4317, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4317)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  12. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate articles : age, discipline, audience size, and impact (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4349, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4349)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  13. Thelwall, M.: Web indicators for research evaluation : a practical guide (2016) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  14. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  15. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: News stories as evidence for research? : BBC citations from articles, Books, and Wikipedia (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4760, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4760)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  16. Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Web citations in patents : evidence of technological impact? (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4764, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4764)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  17. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends : a professional site with academic and educational uses (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4766, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4766)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  18. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4768, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4768)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  19. Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
    Theme
    Informetrie
  20. Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: How quickly do publications get read? : the evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles (2018) 4.44 
    4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 15) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  4.441648 = fieldWeight in 15, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=15)
    Theme
    Informetrie

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 71
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 71
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications