-
Barry, C.I.; Schamber, L.: User-defined relevance criteria : a comparison of 2 studies (1995)
5.50
5.498932 = weight(theme_ss:Retrievalstudien in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
5.498932 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
5.498932 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
- Theme
- Retrievalstudien
-
Schamber, L.; Bateman, J.: User criteria in relevance evaluation : toward development of a measurement scale (1996)
5.50
5.498932 = weight(theme_ss:Retrievalstudien in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
5.498932 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
5.498932 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
- Theme
- Retrievalstudien
-
Barry, C.L.; Schamber, L.: Users' criteria for relevance evaluation : a cross-situational comparison (1998)
5.50
5.498932 = weight(theme_ss:Retrievalstudien in 4271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
5.498932 = fieldWeight in 4271, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
5.498932 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4271)
- Theme
- Retrievalstudien