-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.D.: What do citation counts measure? : a review of studies on citing behavior (2008)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 2729, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2729)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3861, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3861)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 985, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=985)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 186, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=186)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.; Bornmann, L.: How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? : An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts (2013)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 1532, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1532)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Radicchi, F.; Bornmann, L.; Castellano, C.; Nooy, W. de: Field-normalized impact factors (IFs) : a comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 2108, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2108)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Mutz, R.: Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? (2014)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F.de: What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? : Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking (2014)
4.44
4.441648 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.441648 = fieldWeight in 2235, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.441648 = idf(docFreq=1421, maxDocs=44421)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2235)
- Theme
- Informetrie
