-
Steinberger, J.; Poesio, M.; Kabadjov, M.A.; Jezek, K.: Two uses of anaphora resolution in summarization (2007)
1.51
1.5095836 = sum of:
1.5095836 = product of:
3.0191672 = sum of:
0.027275188 = weight(abstract_txt:analysis in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027275188 = score(doc=1949,freq=1.0), product of:
0.09576344 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0486625 = boost
3.6456752 = idf(docFreq=3151, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
0.28481838 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
3.6456752 = idf(docFreq=3151, maxDocs=44421)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
0.36248603 = weight(abstract_txt:resolution in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36248603 = score(doc=1949,freq=3.0), product of:
0.37254182 = queryWeight, product of:
2.068347 = boost
7.190608 = idf(docFreq=90, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
0.9730077 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
3.0 = termFreq=3.0
7.190608 = idf(docFreq=90, maxDocs=44421)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
2.629406 = weight(title_txt:anaphora in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
2.629406 = score(doc=1949,freq=1.0), product of:
0.70756364 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8504841 = boost
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
3.7161405 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.375 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
-
Bonzi, S.: Representation of concepts in text : a comparison of within-document frequency, anaphora, and synonymy (1991)
0.92
0.9151188 = sum of:
0.9151188 = product of:
1.8302376 = sum of:
0.03273022 = weight(abstract_txt:analysis in 4932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03273022 = score(doc=4932,freq=1.0), product of:
0.09576344 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0486625 = boost
3.6456752 = idf(docFreq=3151, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
0.34178203 = fieldWeight in 4932, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
3.6456752 = idf(docFreq=3151, maxDocs=44421)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4932)
0.044570103 = weight(abstract_txt:text in 4932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044570103 = score(doc=4932,freq=1.0), product of:
0.11765115 = queryWeight, product of:
1.1623421 = boost
4.040882 = idf(docFreq=2122, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
0.3788327 = fieldWeight in 4932, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.040882 = idf(docFreq=2122, maxDocs=44421)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4932)
1.7529373 = weight(title_txt:anaphora in 4932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
1.7529373 = score(doc=4932,freq=1.0), product of:
0.70756364 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8504841 = boost
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
2.477427 = fieldWeight in 4932, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.25 = fieldNorm(doc=4932)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
-
Wu, D.-S.; Liang, T.: Chinese pronominal anaphora resolution using lexical knowledge and entropy-based weight (2008)
0.70
0.7026999 = sum of:
0.7026999 = product of:
2.1080997 = sum of:
0.35516232 = weight(abstract_txt:resolution in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.35516232 = score(doc=3367,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37254182 = queryWeight, product of:
2.068347 = boost
7.190608 = idf(docFreq=90, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
0.9533489 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.190608 = idf(docFreq=90, maxDocs=44421)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
1.7529373 = weight(title_txt:anaphora in 3367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
1.7529373 = score(doc=3367,freq=1.0), product of:
0.70756364 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8504841 = boost
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
2.477427 = fieldWeight in 3367, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.25 = fieldNorm(doc=3367)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
-
Schmolz, H.: Anaphora resolution and text retrieval : a lnguistic analysis of hypertexts (2015)
0.37
0.36519524 = sum of:
0.36519524 = product of:
2.1911714 = sum of:
2.1911714 = weight(title_txt:anaphora in 2172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
2.1911714 = score(doc=2172,freq=1.0), product of:
0.70756364 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8504841 = boost
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
3.0967836 = fieldWeight in 2172, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
0.3125 = fieldNorm(doc=2172)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Pirkola, A.; Jarvelin, K.: ¬The effect of anaphor and ellipsis resolution on proximity searching in a text database (1995)
0.28
0.2758868 = sum of:
0.2758868 = product of:
0.5517736 = sum of:
0.026758729 = weight(abstract_txt:retrieval in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026758729 = score(doc=4156,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08708197 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4765 = idf(docFreq=3732, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
0.3072821 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4765 = idf(docFreq=3732, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.05146512 = weight(abstract_txt:text in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05146512 = score(doc=4156,freq=3.0), product of:
0.11765115 = queryWeight, product of:
1.1623421 = boost
4.040882 = idf(docFreq=2122, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
0.4374383 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
3.0 = termFreq=3.0
4.040882 = idf(docFreq=2122, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.47354978 = weight(abstract_txt:resolution in 4156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.47354978 = score(doc=4156,freq=8.0), product of:
0.37254182 = queryWeight, product of:
2.068347 = boost
7.190608 = idf(docFreq=90, maxDocs=44421)
0.025048748 = queryNorm
1.2711319 = fieldWeight in 4156, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.190608 = idf(docFreq=90, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4156)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
