-
O'Leary, M.: FirstSearch takes the lead (1992)
3.95
3.9451125 = sum of:
3.9451125 = weight(title_txt:firstsearch in 3121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
3.9451125 = fieldWeight in 3121, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.5 = fieldNorm(doc=3121)
-
Gupta, U.; Salisbury, L.: Is FirstSearch really attractive? (1992)
3.95
3.9451125 = sum of:
3.9451125 = weight(title_txt:firstsearch in 3863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
3.9451125 = fieldWeight in 3863, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.5 = fieldNorm(doc=3863)
-
Boyett, S.: FirstSearch in public libraries (1994)
3.95
3.9451125 = sum of:
3.9451125 = weight(title_txt:firstsearch in 7967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
3.9451125 = fieldWeight in 7967, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.5 = fieldNorm(doc=7967)
-
Bénaud, C.-L.; Bordeianu, S.: OCLC's FirstSearch catalog (1995)
3.95
3.9451125 = sum of:
3.9451125 = weight(title_txt:firstsearch in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
3.9451125 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.5 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
-
Sullivan, J.: Why a new FirstSearch? (1999)
3.95
3.9451125 = sum of:
3.9451125 = weight(title_txt:firstsearch in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
3.9451125 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
0.5 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
