Document (#33322)

Author

Pan, G.
Pan, S.L.
Newman, M.

Title

Information systems project post-mortems : insights from an attribution perspective

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.14, S. 2255-2268

Year

2007

Abstract

Information systems (IS) project failure is a costly and common problem. This is despite advances in development tools and technologies. In this article, we argue that one reason for this is the failure of project post-mortems to generate constructive lessons learned from previous projects. Over time, the ineffective practices would persist in the organization, rendering it resistant to change. The attribution theory literature serves as one of the few promising theoretical bases to explain why project post-mortems fail. A case study of a project post-mortem undertaken for an abandoned electronic procurement system project is discussed and analyzed. We identify five antecedent conditions of attribution error: the presence of self-appointed mindsets, the general persistence of negative beliefs, memory decay, selective recall of project events and the influence of power dynamics within the organization. We discuss the research and practical implications of these findings and suggest how the problem of attribution error may be minimized in project post-mortems.

Similar documents (author)

1. Newman, N.: Search strategies and activities of BBC news interactive (2007) 6.19

   6.1935673 = sum of:
     6.1935673 = weight(author_txt:newman in 1381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
       6.1935673 = fieldWeight in 1381, product of:
         1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
           1.0 = termFreq=1.0
         9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
         0.625 = fieldNorm(doc=1381)
   

2. Newman, D.J.; Block, S.: Probabilistic topic decomposition of an eighteenth-century American newspaper (2006) 4.95

   4.954854 = sum of:
     4.954854 = weight(author_txt:newman in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
       4.954854 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
         1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
           1.0 = termFreq=1.0
         9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
         0.5 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
   

3. Hagedorn, K.; Chapman, S.; Newman, D.: Enhancing search and browse using automated clustering of subject metadata (2007) 3.72

   3.7161405 = sum of:
     3.7161405 = weight(author_txt:newman in 2168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
       3.7161405 = fieldWeight in 2168, product of:
         1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
           1.0 = termFreq=1.0
         9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
         0.375 = fieldNorm(doc=2168)
   

4. Kay, L.; Newman, N.; Youtie, J.; Porter, A.L.; Rafols, I.: Patent overlay mapping : visualizing technological distance (2014) 3.10

   3.0967836 = sum of:
     3.0967836 = weight(author_txt:newman in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
       3.0967836 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
         1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
           1.0 = termFreq=1.0
         9.909708 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44421)
         0.3125 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
   

Similar documents (content)

1. Drewitt, D.; Morris, D.: LOIS (Library Online Information Service) (1996) 0.07

   0.065600365 = sum of:
     0.065600365 = product of:
       0.5466697 = sum of:
         0.06489948 = weight(abstract_txt:lessons in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.06489948 = score(doc=431,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.09938757 = queryWeight, product of:
               6.965269 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.652994 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               6.965269 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44421)
               0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
         0.22362968 = weight(abstract_txt:post in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.22362968 = score(doc=431,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.38771644 = queryWeight, product of:
               4.416478 = boost
               6.1523914 = idf(docFreq=256, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.5767867 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               6.1523914 = idf(docFreq=256, maxDocs=44421)
               0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
         0.25814053 = weight(abstract_txt:project in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.25814053 = score(doc=431,freq=4.0), product of:
             0.3143538 = queryWeight, product of:
               5.0302353 = boost
               4.3796177 = idf(docFreq=1512, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.8211783 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
               2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                 4.0 = termFreq=4.0
               4.3796177 = idf(docFreq=1512, maxDocs=44421)
               0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
       0.12 = coord(3/25)
   

2. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: ¬A comparative approach to system evaluation : delegating control of retrieval tests to an experimental online system (1996) 0.07

   0.065423906 = sum of:
     0.065423906 = product of:
       0.40889943 = sum of:
         0.008027176 = weight(abstract_txt:this in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.008027176 = score(doc=504,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.0355839 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.0363855 = boost
               2.4062347 = idf(docFreq=10885, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.2255845 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               2.4062347 = idf(docFreq=10885, maxDocs=44421)
               0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
         0.048172325 = weight(abstract_txt:problem in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.048172325 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
             0.08147724 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.2804632 = boost
               4.4593854 = idf(docFreq=1396, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.5912366 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
               1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                 2.0 = termFreq=2.0
               4.4593854 = idf(docFreq=1396, maxDocs=44421)
               0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
         0.22362968 = weight(abstract_txt:post in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.22362968 = score(doc=504,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.38771644 = queryWeight, product of:
               4.416478 = boost
               6.1523914 = idf(docFreq=256, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.5767867 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               6.1523914 = idf(docFreq=256, maxDocs=44421)
               0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
         0.12907027 = weight(abstract_txt:project in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.12907027 = score(doc=504,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.3143538 = queryWeight, product of:
               5.0302353 = boost
               4.3796177 = idf(docFreq=1512, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.41058916 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               4.3796177 = idf(docFreq=1512, maxDocs=44421)
               0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
       0.16 = coord(4/25)
   

3. Mansourian, Y.; Ford, N.: Web searchers' attributions of success and failure: an empirical study (2007) 0.06

   0.06414648 = sum of:
     0.06414648 = product of:
       0.534554 = sum of:
         0.005676071 = weight(abstract_txt:this in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.005676071 = score(doc=1840,freq=2.0), product of:
             0.0355839 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.0363855 = boost
               2.4062347 = idf(docFreq=10885, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.15951234 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
               1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                 2.0 = termFreq=2.0
               2.4062347 = idf(docFreq=10885, maxDocs=44421)
               0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
         0.06590303 = weight(abstract_txt:failure in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.06590303 = score(doc=1840,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.20081902 = queryWeight, product of:
               2.010256 = boost
               7.000987 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.32817125 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               7.000987 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44421)
               0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
         0.4629749 = weight(abstract_txt:attribution in 1840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.4629749 = score(doc=1840,freq=6.0), product of:
             0.5107391 = queryWeight, product of:
               4.533812 = boost
               7.894805 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.90648025 = fieldWeight in 1840, product of:
               2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                 6.0 = termFreq=6.0
               7.894805 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44421)
               0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1840)
       0.12 = coord(3/25)
   

4. Koppel, M.; Winter, Y.: Determining if two documents are written by the same author (2014) 0.06

   0.062771566 = sum of:
     0.062771566 = product of:
       0.5230964 = sum of:
         0.013244165 = weight(abstract_txt:this in 2602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.013244165 = score(doc=2602,freq=2.0), product of:
             0.0355839 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.0363855 = boost
               2.4062347 = idf(docFreq=10885, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.37219545 = fieldWeight in 2602, product of:
               1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                 2.0 = termFreq=2.0
               2.4062347 = idf(docFreq=10885, maxDocs=44421)
               0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2602)
         0.068831936 = weight(abstract_txt:problem in 2602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.068831936 = score(doc=2602,freq=3.0), product of:
             0.08147724 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.2804632 = boost
               4.4593854 = idf(docFreq=1396, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.8447996 = fieldWeight in 2602, product of:
               1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                 3.0 = termFreq=3.0
               4.4593854 = idf(docFreq=1396, maxDocs=44421)
               0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2602)
         0.44102028 = weight(abstract_txt:attribution in 2602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.44102028 = score(doc=2602,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.5107391 = queryWeight, product of:
               4.533812 = boost
               7.894805 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.8634943 = fieldWeight in 2602, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               7.894805 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44421)
               0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2602)
       0.12 = coord(3/25)
   

5. Goh, D.H.-L.; Ng, P.K.: Link decay in leading information science journals (2007) 0.06

   0.06062297 = sum of:
     0.06062297 = product of:
       0.37889358 = sum of:
         0.18574424 = weight(abstract_txt:decay in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.18574424 = score(doc=2334,freq=5.0), product of:
             0.1535273 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.2428731 = boost
               8.656945 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             1.209845 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
               2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                 5.0 = termFreq=5.0
               8.656945 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44421)
               0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
         0.02270865 = weight(abstract_txt:problem in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.02270865 = score(doc=2334,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.08147724 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.2804632 = boost
               4.4593854 = idf(docFreq=1396, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.2787116 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               4.4593854 = idf(docFreq=1396, maxDocs=44421)
               0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
         0.082569964 = weight(abstract_txt:error in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.082569964 = score(doc=2334,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.19265938 = queryWeight, product of:
               1.9689924 = boost
               6.8572807 = idf(docFreq=126, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.42858005 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               6.8572807 = idf(docFreq=126, maxDocs=44421)
               0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
         0.08787071 = weight(abstract_txt:failure in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
           0.08787071 = score(doc=2334,freq=1.0), product of:
             0.20081902 = queryWeight, product of:
               2.010256 = boost
               7.000987 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44421)
               0.014269021 = queryNorm
             0.4375617 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
               1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                 1.0 = termFreq=1.0
               7.000987 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44421)
               0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
       0.16 = coord(4/25)